|
|

|
Understanding
the Colonial Economy: Mexico / NAFTA
Teacher
Version
Grades 9-12 (may be
adapted for 6-8)
Introduction
Lesson Extension for
"Understanding the Colonial Economy," from
the Eyes on the Economy:
Part I
Often teachers and
students are able to internalize historical and economic concepts through
a more recent event that has occurred within their time frame. This lesson
is an extension for the lesson, "Understanding the Colonial Economy."
It examines the role and effect of NAFTA in the Mexican and US economies.
The Economic Standards
- National Content Standards in Economics
- Standard
5 - students understand that:
- Voluntary exchange
occurs only when all participating parties expect to gain. This is true
for trade among individuals or organizations within a nation, and among
individuals or organizations in different nations.
- Standard
6 - students will understand that:
- When individuals,
regions, and nations specialize in what they can produce at the lowest
cost and then trade with others, both production and consumption increase.
Lesson
Plan
Review with students
that in the lesson on"Understanding the Colonial Economy," they learned
that the colonists produced what they could best produce relative to their
available resources and that they could export at a competitive price.
They then traded these goods and earned more income that led to the colonist
expanding their output. Through trade both the Europeans and the colonist
gained more products and were better off than if trade was not conducted.
Display
Screen 1
and read the quote from Adam Smith:
| In 1776 Adam
Smith said:
It
is the maxim of every prudent master of a family, never to attempt
to make at home what it will cost him more to make than to buy.
The taylor does not attempt to make his own shoes, but buys them
of the shoemaker. The shoemaker does not attempt to make his own
clothes but employs a Taylor The farmer attempts to make neither
the one nor the other, but employs those different artificers. All
of them find it for their interest to employ their whole industry
in a way in which they have some advantage over their neighbors,
and to purchase with a part of its produce, or what is the same
thing, with the price of a part of it, whatever else they have occasion
for.
-Adam
Smith, Wealth of Nations (New York: Modern Library, Inc.
1937), p.424.
|
Pose the question:
"How does Adam Smith's philosophy relate to what you have learned in the
lesson, Understanding the Colonial Economy?"
The Taylor
(spelling reflects Adam Smith's time) has special skills that enables
him/her to produce clothes whereas the shoe maker has special skills in
the production of shoes. Through trade both the shoemaker and Taylor gain
(more clothes for shoemaker and more shoes for the Taylor). Like the Taylor
and the shoemaker, the colonists and the Europeans each produced what
they could produce best with their individual resources that the other
party wanted. By trading, both parties, the Europeans and the colonists,
were better off.
Ask students if they
think this theory still hold true today and why.
Answers will vary.
Display
Screen 2. Review with students the following definitions:
-
Tariff
- A tax levied
on goods imported into a country, i.e. a 10% tariff levied on
an imported car priced at $20,000 would increase the price to
$22,000.
- Quota
- Specifies
maximum amounts of goods that can be imported in any period of
time.
- Subsidy
- A subsidy
is a payment made to a producer, i.e. The Wool Act, in 1990 had
a subsidy rate of 127 percent. The farmer who got $1000 for selling
wool in the market would receive an additional payment from the
government of $1270.
|
Tell students that
a recent agreement was made between the United States and Mexico and Canada
called the North America Free Trade Act or NAFTA. NAFTA was passed by
the United Congress in 1993. The underlining purpose of this legislation
was to remove some tariffs and quotas in order to improve trade among
the three partners, United States, Canada and Mexico. Display
Screen 3 reviewing the key points.
|
What
Is NAFTA?
NAFTA
is a comprehensive rules-based agreement among the United States,
Canada, and Mexico that took effect January 1, 1994. It was passed
by the U.S. Congress in November 1993. The Agreement eliminated
many tariffs immediately while other tariffs will fall to zero over
a 5 to 15 year period. NAFTA goes well beyond tariff reduction.
- It opened
previously protected sectors in agriculture, energy, textiles,
and automotive trade.
- It opened
up the U.S.-Mexico border to trade in services with specific rules
in finance, transportation, and telecommunications.
- It set rules
on government procurement and intellectual property rights.
- It set specific
safeguards, including how to deal with subsidies and unfair practices;
it set up procedures for dealing with private commercial or agricultural
disputes; and it set up a process for dealing with NAFTA implementation
concerns.
|
At this point, you
may have the students listen to an interview
with Lacey Gallagher, of Latin American Ratings with Standard and Poor's.
Remind students that
Adam Smith pointed out in 1776 that if countries specialize and trade
all parties benefit.
Ask students: Do
you think that as a result of NAFTA, trade increased between the United
States and Mexico and improved the economic welfare of both nations? Explain.
Once barriers
interfering with trade were lifted, the US could export more to Mexico
and the US would import more from Mexico. The citizens of both countries
would benefit through increased trade.
Distribute a copy
of the WEB QUEST activity to each student.
Tell students to use the web sites listed on the activity to gather information
on changes in:
- GDP between 1991
and 1998 for the United States and Mexico.
- Amount of Mexican
exports to the US in dollars.
- Amount of US exports
to Mexico in dollars .
- Exports from one
US state to Mexico in dollars between 1993-1998 (State will be assigned
by teacher.)
Also,
have students locate data on the impact of NAFTA on individual states.
Assign each student a different state for which they should locate the
changes in US export totals to Mexico in US dollars between 1993 and 1998.
| Exports
to Mexico |
| |
North Dakota |
Michigan |
| 1993 |
$2,885,049 |
$5,630,585,341 |
| 1994 |
$1,804,513 |
$7,088,510,215
|
| 1995 |
$16,768,632 |
$5,002,780,137 |
| 1996 |
$11,485,195 |
$4,686,816,562 |
| 1997 |
$17,559,888 |
$6,458,029,002 |
Students will observe
some states such as North Dakota have experienced significant growth since
1993 whereas others such as Michigan have basically seen little change
in their exports.
Tell students once
they have gathered this data, they will work in groups to answer the questions
in the WEB QUEST activity.
After students have
gathered the information from the Internet, divide them into small groups
Ask members of the group to share their findings and answer the questions.
Discussion
Questions
- What is the annual
trade surplus for Mexico in trading with the US since 1995?
Trade surplus has been in the $15 to $18 billion range.
- What are the implications
for Mexico?
Their positive trade balance has had a positive impact on the Mexican
economy - generating more jobs and increasing GDP.
- Given the two
way trade between the US and Mexico, what has been the percentage growth
in trade between the two countries since the implementation of NAFTA?
Trade has increased approximately 110%.
- How could this
increase in trade affect job creation in Mexico?
This increase in trade has led to more jobs.
- In time, How might
an increase in jobs affect wages and worker skills?
Wages increase, more technical skills required and better educated labor
force .
- How would the
reestablishment of trade barriers between Mexico and the United States
affect the following: Mexico's economy, the US economy, the US consumer?
The impact would be much greater on the Mexican economy since a much
larger % of the Mexican GDP is correlated to the exports to the US.
US citizens would probably pay higher prices on some products if Mexican
imports were reduced since there would be a reduction in competition
.
Ask students to make
a generalization about the impact of NAFTA on the United States and Mexico.
Students
should be able to generalize that NAFTA has positive implications for
Mexico and the US.
- United States
- Since the United
States is a developed economy the impact on the US would be less. However
there may be certain geographic regions that are impacted to a greater
degree. The data suggested these states would most likely be in the
Southwest US along with industrial states in the Midwest. As in the
colonies (less developed) and Europe (more developed) both countries
will gain. Although both countries gain, there will be some businesses
that may be hurt by increased competition in both countries.
- Mexico
- With the Mexican
economy being smaller and less developed the resulting impact on Mexico
would be greater. Some industries will expand while others may have
to change or close down. Through trade more products will be available
and consumers and some producers will benefit in both countries.
Display Screen
1. Reread Adam Smith's quote. Ask students:
Does Adam Smith's
philosophy on free trade still hold true today for NAFTA? Explain.
Adam Smith's philosophy written in 1776 regarding benefits of trade
rings true today. Companies in Mexico and the United States specialize
with each producing what they can produce best with their individual resources.
These goods can be traded to earn income. In turn, each can purchase products
they want and don't produce. Through trade both groups are better off.
Restrictions on trade generally are at the expense of the consumers who
pay higher prices because of the reduction in competition.
How might NAFTA affect
you and your future?
The Mexican economy should continue to grow with trade expanding between
the US and Mexico. This trade extension could create increased opportunities
for existing businesses among young people entering the labor force.
|
|